TABLE
-1
“Real Estate Reporter” data
Increase in Land Rates:
Sl. No.
|
Location
|
2001
|
2002
|
Growth
in Percen-
tage
|
2003
|
Growth
in Percen-
Tage
|
2004
|
Growth
in Percen-
tage
|
Rate per Sft in Rs.
|
Rate per Sft in Rs.
|
Rate per Sft in Rs.
|
Rate per Sft in Rs.
|
|||||
01.
|
Banashankari
|
1125
|
1075
|
- 4.4
|
1175
|
+ 9.30
|
1400
|
+ 19.14
|
02.
|
____
|
____
|
775
|
+ 19.23
|
900
|
+ 16.13
|
||
03.
|
HSR Layout
|
------
|
775
|
------
|
1250
|
+ 61.30
|
1700
|
+ 36
|
04.
|
J.P. Nagar
|
1150
|
1175
|
+ 2.17
|
1200
|
+ 2.12
|
1625
|
+ 35.41
|
05.
|
Koramangala
|
1350
|
1800
|
+ 33.33
|
1900
|
+ 5.56
|
2400
|
+ 26.31
|
06.
|
Malleswaram
|
1600
|
1600
|
------
|
1600
|
------
|
2100
|
+ 31.25
|
07.
|
3500
|
4250
|
+ 21.42
|
4250
|
------
|
4500
|
+ 5.88
|
|
08.
|
Yeshwanthpur
|
------
|
800
|
------
|
825
|
+ 3.12
|
1300
|
+ 57.57
|
09.
|
Rajajinagar
|
975
|
1300
|
+ 33.33
|
1375
|
+ 5.76
|
1550
|
+ 12.72
|
10.
|
Vijaynagar
|
1000
|
1075
|
+ 7.50
|
1300
|
+ 20.93
|
1700
|
+ 30.76
|
The chart above shows the rate growth in certain
selected areas of Bangalore
from 2001 to 2004. It may be observed HSR Layout has recorded a growth of
61.30% during 2003, the highest among selected centres. Koramangala has
registered a growth of 33.33% during 2001-2002, Yeshwanthapura, hitherto neglected
area has an impressive growth of 57.57% during the year 2004, in contrast to a
growth of 3.12% during 2003.
The growth in old areas like
Malleswaram and Rajajinagar is not so abnormal as the development is almost
saturated, any growth in construction/ development of land is because of
demolition of old structures and due to demolishing of residential premises,
which are then replaced by commercial buildings. Most of the residents in these
areas are moving to peripheral areas and once a peaceful residential area these
areas are gradually becoming highly polluted and crowded.
The most frequently explained reason
for growth is inflation. Income Tax Act has cost inflection index to account
for inflation, with 1980 as a base with 100 points, which goes on increasing
based on inflation. The inflation aided for the years 2001-02, 2002-03, 2003-04
and 2004-05 are as provided hereunder (see Table-2).
One may observe that the increase in the rates
have not much relevance to the inflation. Though inflation has a part to play
in increase of property rates, there are various other factors, which propel
the rise of property price in Bangalore .
The universally accepted supply-demand position plays an important role, which
is again influenced by the local factors.
TABLE-2
Cost inflection index
Year
|
Points
|
Percentage of growth
|
2001-02
|
426
|
|
2002-03
|
447
|
4.93%
|
2003-04
|
463
|
3.58%
|
2004-05
|
480
|
3.67%
|
Acquisition of Land by Government:
The Government of Karnataka acquires land in
peripheral areas of Bangalore
supposedly for a social cause like providing sites to the needy person, and
also for development. But more often than not the various agencies of
government acquire more land than required. The proposed projects Arkavathy
Layout and Bangalore-Mysore infrastructure corridor are classical examples of
the recurring mistakes committed by the Government. There seems, to be no
proper assessment of requirements of the citizens for whom the said land is
being acquired/distributed and some influential persons/land sharks operate in
acquisitions. Such excess lands are retained by the government and allotted to
persons who have a say in the government. As such land gets locked causing
paucity, curtailing the free supply.
Failure of BDA to complete the projects:
BDA though is super active in land acquisition,
and allotment, it is however lethargic in developing the said layouts. The
Anjanapura layout, Visveswaraiah layouts are underdeveloped and may take years
to have proper infrastructure in order for people to construct houses and
reside there. The allotment in Arkavathy layout is yet to be completed. Thus
due to the inability of the BDA to complete any project undertaken by it within
its own estimated time inflation is fuelled. Further it is faulty compensatory
packages for acquisition of property, which forces the land owners to resort to
litigation. This is especially true in Arkravathy layout where the compensation
package is not even close to the real market price at which the land in the
same area is being privately traded. Thus whereas the compensation package in
some other areas were atleast 80 % of the real market value in most parts of
Akravathy layout the said land is being acquired for less than 20 % of its
market value and it is this unrealistic valuation which has caused the
landowners to fight the acquisition tooth and nail. There are well-developed pockets in the said
Arkavathy layout, which BDA proposes to bulldoze. This is a strange logic, when
the purpose of acquisition is to allot sites to construct houses; the
demolition of constructed houses belies any logic. The residents of many
developed layouts claim that they have constructed houses much before
notification and BDA has not done proper survey. This leads to B.D.A.’s
acquisition plans facing legal hurdles because in most cases the residents go
to the court and obtain a stay of the proposed acquisition by the BDA and at
present the High Court of Karnataka is looking into the matter and hence the
BDA has not been able to achieve any break through in allotting the sites in
the notified areas notified for acquisition. Many such under developed layouts
in and around the city fuel the price rise, as the land gets locked up for some
years and people seldom purchase sites in underdeveloped layouts.
Stamp duty and Registration charges:
Stamp duty in Karnataka is very high and the
Government of the day increases the duty payable ever so often and coupled with
the regular increase in prescribe guidance value for registration of transfer
of immovable properties. Though the rates are marginally reduced; the
apartments are at the receiving end. The Government of Karnataka has fixed the
stamp duty for flats for first sale at par with other properties and has
removed the duty on slab basis thus an apartment valued ten lakhs attracts a
stamp duty of Rs.80,000/- where as it was Rs.42,000 earlier.
Assume that an immovable property is
transferred three times. Actual value of the immovable property is Rupees ten
lakhs. The stamp duty and registration charges are 10%.
(a)
Cost
to the 1st transferee inclusive of stamp duty and registration
charges Rs. 10,00,000+10% = Rs.
11,00,000.
(b)
The first transferee does not want to loose anything but transfers the
property at acquisition rate, without
any profit Rs. 11,00,000 + 10%= 12,10,000/- (cost to the IInd Transferee)
(c) The
2 nd transferee also sells the property at acquisition cost without
any
lose or gain Rs.12,10,000+10% = Rs.13,31,000/- (cost to the
III
Transferee)
The stamp duty on any property includes the
cost of land and that of structure thereon. There is provision in the Stamp Act
for depreciation on old buildings, however the registering authorities do not
allow for depreciation on old building and generally levy stamp duty as is
applicable to a new building. Further the purchasers of the old building do not
avail of the said provisions due to the practical difficulties faced since the
entire system for fixing market value is not transparent and the procedure for
fixing and appraisal of the property is a cumbersome and time consuming process
which discourages the genuine purchasers. Thus frequent transfers of property
leads to increase in price due to addition of the cost of Stamp duty and
registration charges to the cost of the property, though the actual property
rate remains constant during the said period.
Guidance value:
The Department of Registration and Stamps
prescribe guidance value for registration of transfer of immovable properties.
These rates are revised every year.
These are minimum values on which stamp duty and registration charges
are payable. Even if a property is transferred for a value less than prescribed
guidance value, the stamp duty are registration are payable as per the guidance
value. The government revised the guidance
value from 02/08/2004. The revised values are more than the previous values,
thus for instance in certain parts of M.
G. Road , the market rate for the upper floors of a
office building is between the range of Rs. 2,500/- to 3,000/-, however the actual
market rate prevailing is considerably higher at Rs. 4,550/-. The revised guidance has prescribed separate
values for apartments and flats, depending upon the type of flooring. Every
time when guidance values are increased, the property rates correspondingly
soar to higher rates. The rates have registered a huge growth from August 2004
on wards on account of increased guidance value.
Prohibition on issue of Khatas:
The city is surrounded by seven City Municipal
Councils and one Taluk Municipal Council. Many of the lands in these areas were
notified for acquisition or agricultural lands or falls in green belt area.
Municipal Council are collecting betterment charges and issuing khatas
(Municipal administration record MAR 19) without any regard for procedures laws
in force. This led to uncontrolled growth. In order to control, these unplanned
and illegal developments, the Government of Karnataka issued a notification
during 2003 prohibiting collection of betterment charges and issue of Kathas
from 29/05/2003. Subsequently as the municipal councils faced resource crunch,
the Government issued orders to municipal councils to collect property tax
under self-assessment scheme through form no. 3, which is just a receipt for
payment of property tax. The Katha (MAR19) is a prerequisite for approval of
plan. As the municipal councils are not issuing Kathas, no building plans are
approved and the construction activity has come to stand still around Bangalore , creating
artificial scarcity of land.
Approval of Layouts:
Any layout formed needs approval of BDA, BMRDA.
Though many layouts are developed around Bangalore ,
they are not approved by authorities. Such an unapproved layouts may be
notified for acquisition by government agencies. Purchasers, mostly middle-income
group do not prefer such layouts. BDA and BMRDA frequently publishes the list
of unapproved layouts and cautions the people from purchasing sites in such
layouts. So well developed layouts remain unsold, causing shortage of land.
Concentration of Public
Offices, Service Centres:
Many of the
public offices are concentrated in and around Vidhana Soudha. The private
offices are located in central Business district. Even one can see the
concentration of educational institutions, hospitals, and recreational centres
at one place. Naturally people would like to reside near to their workspace.
This is more so in case of offices of Information Technology, Business process
out sourcing, and call centres, where employees have to stay late hours.
Commuting during late hours is risky. So one may find concentration of
residential clusters around work places, which has influenced the price rise in
certain pockets in east Bangalore . Persons employed in software and other
related industries prefer group housing for safety. Such group housing colonies are concentrated
around the work places, which have led to price rise. Inspite of heavy price, IT personnel prefer
such locations.
Construction Costs / Lending
rates:
The cost of all construction materials has increased.
The cement and steel form major portion of construction, and rates of both have
increased abnormally. Many financial
institutions have increased the lending rates for Home Loans, thus finance and
acquiring a house has become costly, thus increasing the acquiring cost,
leading to price rise. Mostly it is demand and supply factor responsible for
price rise. As the population of the city is growing, the availability of land
is restricted on account of various factors discussed.