Advocate S Selvakumar|Property advocates in Bangalore|Property lawyers in Bangalore
The Karnataka State consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has found, Kattada, a partnership
firm in High Grounds, guilty of deficient service and has ordered it to pay Rs
ten,000 as compensation to a client for inflicting him mental distress.
The plaintiff,
C.D. George, had complained against Kattada to the Commission and requested it
to direct Kattada to execute and register the sale deed in his name of the flat
bought from them, and to supply a coated lot ahead of the most building and
servant quarters on the terrace as assured by them. He had additionally
demanded one set of certified copies of documents of title associated with the
aforementioned flat.
Mr george
told the Commission that the firm made flat No. 301 at RMV Extension, however
while not the lot ahead of the most building and servants quarters on the
terrace. They additionally failed to offer the rest room on the terrace.
Commission
President T. Jayarama Chouta, and members Abdul Perwad and avatar Ananth told
Kattada to supply the lot ahead of the most building and servants quarters, and
to furnish the certified copies of documents of title regarding the flat.
BUILDERS: Ms. Kashiamma had seen an ad within the papers during which Messrs M
Hussain, T A Shahul Hameed and mohammad Iqbal of Mangalore had planned to
construct a multi-storeyed living accommodations advanced referred to as
'Golden Apartments' .
She
approached the party that in agreement to sell her one residential living accommodation
for Rs. 10 lakhs. MS Kashiamma paid up Rs. five large integer to Mahound Iqbal
of Kedavath Towers, Mission Street, Mangalore in 1997.
The sellers
were imagined to complete the development of the complete advanced among
eighteen months failing that they were at risk of refund the advance quantity
paid with interest at twenty per cent. But even when eighteen months, solely
upto the roof block of the primary floor was complete. They failed to refund
the money as requested by her and he or she complained to the Commission.
The opposite
parties filed their version with the Commission denying all the allegations of
the complainant. They additionally denied the very fact of receiving a add of
Rs. 5 lakh as advance from her. Finding the 3 sellers guilty of deficient
service, the Commission ordered them to refund Rs. five large integer to the
plaintiff with interest at twenty per cent from 1997 until date of payment
together with Rs. 10,00,000 as iquidat- ED damages for breach of contract
committed by the parties, residing in Fathima Mansion, Highland, Manga- content
and Mission Street, Mangalore.
More,
No comments:
Post a Comment