Monday 1 June 2015

NEW GUIDANCE VALUE – IS BLOW TO COMMON MAN



Dasara is the state festival (Nadahabba) of Karnataka and generally any Government rewards its citizens on such happy occasion.  But Bangaloreans, who were rejoicing in celebrations and picknicking were shell shocked to hear that Guidelines values for registration of properties in 12 sub-registrar’s office of Bangalore are revised upwards from 14th October 2005.

What is Guidance Value


These values are fixed by Department of Registration & Stamps.  These are the minimum values that a property in specified areas would supposed to fetch and on which stamp duty and registration charges are to be paid.  The value varies from area to area.  This is different from market value.  If the purchase value is more than the guidance value, the stamp duty and registration charges are to be paid on the purchase value.

Vicious circle

 The Government of Karnataka had revised the guidance values previously on 02.08.2004.  Before it was done during July 2002.  The hike in guidance value on 02.08.2004 at certain places was abnormal more than 200% which was much resented by common public, as owning a house had become unaffordable by then itself.  When the Government increases the guidance value; the price of properties begins to soar, when the market value increases, the government enhances the guidance value; the guidance value and market value each trying to catch each other, which never happens.  But gradually the shelter, a home, a fundamental need will become a day dream and purchasers become scarce.  The properties may not find buyers and the market may crash leading severe dent in economy of the country.  The Government is myopic targeting immediate increase in revenue, a short term benefit least bothered about long term effect.  The latest revision effective from 14.10.2005; has been done without any link to the prevailing rates.  The revised rates are abnormal.  The rise and fall of rates are natural in any business and the Government should allow any sector to have its natural course.  The review of the Guidance values should not be too frequent.  The property sector is not to be allowed to become a share market.  Some of the examples of the revised guideline values will show how the Government had contributed to unreasonable price rise, which may lead to bubbles in market, a dangerous trend.

  

Comparative Statement of Guidance values as on 03.08.2004 and 14.10.2005.

Area
Rate per Sq.ft as on 03.08.2004
Rate per sq.ft. as on 14.10.2005
% increase
Increase in regist-ration charges for a site of 1200 sq.ft in Rs.
Avalahalli  Telecom Layout
450
1000
122.22%
65,736/-
Valmikinagar
300
700
138.33%
47,808/-

Jayanagar





Jayanagar IIIrd Block Circle II
(South end circle, Anebande to 3rd Block Circle  South end) 
1000
2800
180%
2,15,136/-
22nd main road Nanda Talkies to cosmopolitan club
1500
2500
66.66%
1,19,520/-
Rajajinagar




Industrial Town
450
1000
122.22
65,736/-
ESI Hospital
1100
2500
127.2%
1,67,328/-
RGI Colony
400
1100
175%
83,664/-
Bangalore South




Arakere Mico Layout
400
1000
150%
71,712/-
Arakere HSR layout Sector - 7
700
1600
128.57
1,07,568/-
80 feet ring road opposite to HSR Layout
800
1800
125
1,19,500/-
Bilekehally
350
820
128.57%
53,784/-
Vijaya Bank GNS
400
1200
200%
95,600/-

Social obligation


Government has a social obligation to provide affordable shelter to its citizens.  Such affordable house need not be a small hutment, but should at least have minimum requirements like bedroom, kitchen, toilet, hall etc, with sufficient ventilation.  By frequent abnormal increase in Guidance value, the poor, middle class are finding it difficult to purchase the houses and are destined to what the Government provides.  The Government itself is subverting its social obligations.  Real estate investment is becoming the exclusive domain of rich and influential. The government has a duty to not to fuel the price rise.

Stamp duty and Registration Charges.

The stamp duty and registration charges are very high in Karnataka.  As the guideline values increase, it will be more expensive.  Apart from these charges, the purchaser has to pay sales tax, service tax and for transfer of khatha, power, water connection.  The seller has to pay capital gains tax.  Naturally, the parties prefer to disclose the less value in the conveyance document to circumvent increased registration charges and cash component would be more.  This leads to unaccounted transactions, accumulation of black money.  Some may even opt for holding the property through General Power of Attorney, affidavits, by declaration of delivery of possession and avoid registration.  It is a established principle, lower the fees more the income.  The following example elucidates the effect of revised guidelines on stamp duty and Registrations.

Example

The stamp duty payable on conveyance of properties falling under Basavanagudi Sub-registrar’s area is 8.96% and the registration charges are 1%. The increase in stamp duty and registration charges for a 30 X 40 (1200 Sft) at Vijay Bank Griha Nirmana Sangh is worked as below

As per guidance value as on 05.08.2004

Area 1200 sft

Rate per sft –Rs.400/-
Value – Rs.4,80,000/-

Registration


Stamp duty    }
@ 8.96%         }   Rs.  43,050/-
(Rounded off) }

Registration    }
Charges @ 1% }  Rs.    4,800/-
                          -----------------
                          Rs. 47,850/-
                          -----------------                            

As per guidance value as on 14.10.2005



Rate per sft –Rs.1200/-
Value – Rs.14,40,000/-

Registration



Rs.1,29,050/-



Rs.   14,400/-
------------------
Rs.1,43,450/-
------------------
Increase – Rs.95,600 i.e. 199.79%

Practical problems


The Revised guidance value has classified the areas into Main Road, Crosses, Phases, Residential, Commercial and Industrial.  Many areas have sub-crosses, some of the roads are divided into two or more portions.  The registering authority wants a specific proof as to the exact location of the property to arrive at the value of the property.  But the Khatha Certificate issued by the BMP only discloses the ward number and property number.  In such cases, the Sub-registrar applies the highest guidance value applicable to that area, and charges on that basis.  If not he refers to Detection of undervaluation cell.  The parties are subjected to untold harassment.  At times the Deputy Commissioner acts suo-motu and issues the notice of undervaluation after lapse of considerable time, where the property might have changed hands.

HOME LOANS


Financial institutions were very liberal in extending home loans.  This was serving a national cause of providing housing.  But restrictions on registrations of conveyance deed has dented their enthusiasm, and they are playing safe.  Even if they enforce the SARFESAI Act and auction the properties offered as security, they cannot register the sale certificates.

Many purchasers have recourse to the home loans to purchase the property, which is related to their income.  As the price of the properties increase on account of revised guideline values, they may require higher amounts of loan to purchase the properties for which their incomes do not qualify.  They may have to opt for small/substandard properties.  Many agreement holders and vendors may have to opt for litigation.

PROPERTY TAX   


The BMP has planned to switch over to capital based taxation, which is linked to Guidance value, with the increase of the Guidance value, the property taxes will increase.  This will be a additional burden to the citizen.

Impact on Capital Gains


The tax on profit earned on transfer of capital asset that is immovable property has to be paid by the seller.  If the value of the property disclosed in the sale deed is lesser than the guidance value, capital gains tax is payable on the basis of  guidance value.

In case the value disclosed in the document is less than guidance value, value of the property will be deemed as that of guidance value and attracts tax accordingly.  In some cases market value of the property is less than guidance value, and the seller incurs loss.  Guidance value will have the priority and attracts capital gains tax, and the seller has to pay the tax.

Loss of Revenue


By introducing various restrictions on the registration of properties through notifications RD/174/MUNOMU/2005 dated 23.04.2005 and RD/174/MUNOMU/2005 dated 24.05.2005, the registration of properties in the areas of City Municipal Corporations, Village panchayat had come to a stand still.  The clarifications issued by Revenue Secretariat in its notification RD/174/MUNOMU/2005 dated 23.08.2005 has increased confusion and the sub-registrars are refusing to register, the properties in BMP areas including old areas like Chamarajpet, Basavanagudi, Seshadripuram, Shivajinagar, Ulsoor, Avenue Road, etc and are demanding land conversion orders, which is not practically possible.  These properties are centuries old, assessed for property taxes for nearly a century.   Earlier each sub registrar office were registering 300 documents whereas today hardly registers 30 documents per day per office. With the revision of Guidance values it may further go down.

Harassment to the public


The registering public are utterly confused as to the documents required to be submitted for registration, and also jurisdiction of sub-registrar offices.  The Government should implement user friendly measures, make the registration charges affordable, so that revenue to the Government would increase.

The assure online registration, and centralised office have not yet come through, and the present offices are not easily accessible by the public.  The Government should implement these immediately.

No comments:

Post a Comment