(Advocates, Property advocates in Bangalore, Property lawyers in Bangalore)
Before taking possession of the flats purchased by any individual, obtaining Occupancy Certificate (OC) is a “must have document”. If you are denied of the same, then the consumer court can come to your rescue.
Before taking possession of the flats purchased by any individual, obtaining Occupancy Certificate (OC) is a “must have document”. If you are denied of the same, then the consumer court can come to your rescue.
The Bandra
Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum noting that the Occupancy Certificate is an
essential requirement for a flat-buyer, has ordered Dharia Developers to give the
purchaser, the Occupancy Certificate within a specified time.
As per an
agreement dated September 26, 2006, Mr. Mehul Thakkar bought two flats on the
sixth floor (601 and 602) of an apartment building by paying Rs 40.25lakh for
each of the flats, the remaining 1lakh per flat was agreed to be paid at the
time of delivery of possession. It appears that M/s. Dharia Developers had
promised to give the possession of the flats within 12 months from the date of agreement. However, Thakkar is yet to obtain the Occupancy Certificate or the
Completion Certificate for these flats. Hence, Thakkar sent a notice to the
builder demanding the same. When the builder didn't respond, Thakkar filed a
complaint before the Forum and also an application seeking interim relief.
In their defense,
Dharia Developers argued that Thakkar wanted to merge both the flats into a single unit, as per his letter in September 2006. The builder claimed that
though this was against the building's approved plan, they permitted Thakkar to
do so at his own expense after getting an approval from the sanctioning
authorities. The builder stated that since Thakkar couldn't complete the work
in time, the Occupancy Certificate couldn't be obtained from the authorities.
Hence, they are not responsible for the delay in handing over the possession and the Occupancy Certificate to Thakkar.
In their
interim order, which is common for both of Thakkar's flats, the Bandra Consumer
Disputes Redressal Forum has held the builder as having committed deficiency of
service.The forum observed, “These explanations are hardly satisfactory,
because it was an obligation incurred by Thakkar. If Thakkar had not carried
out the modifications that he had suggested, the builder could have completed
the construction disregarding Thakkar's suggestions.” The forum noted that
though Thakkar had given the letter informing of the modifications to the
builder in September 2006, the flat's construction is incomplete even after
three years. “The builder should have completed the constructions, internal as
well as external, as per the original plan, since the modifications were at
Thakkar's instance. The builder was not required to wait till the modifications
were completed. This shows that the builder has put forward a lame excuse for
not completing the construction and for not obtaining the Occupancy
Certificate.
The builder
received almost the entire consideration of the flat, more than Rs 40lakh in
2006. He has retained the amount and utilized the same, but has not collected
the Occupancy Certificate.” The Forum also held, “Obtaining OC is an essential
requirement under the MOFA (Maharashtra Ownership Flat Act) and the flat purchased cannot be legally occupied, unless the Occupancy Certificate is
obtained by the builder. The builder has not produced a single piece of paper
to show that he has taken effective steps with the competent authority for obtaining
Occupancy Certificate.”
More,
No comments:
Post a Comment